Town Scientific, Simferopol, Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Troitsk, Moscow, Russian Federation
Nauchni, Simferopol, Russian Federation
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Nauchni, Simferopol, Russian Federation
Nauchni, Simferopol, Russian Federation
The precursors of earthquakes that occurred on February 6, 2023 with an interval of nine hours in the southeast of Turkey are considered. The epicenter of the first, with a magnitude of 7.8 (± 0.1), was located in the Shehitkamil area in Gaziantep, the epicenter of the second, with a magnitude of 7.5 (± 0.1), was in the Ekinyozu area in Kahramanmarash. The approach used is related to the study of the change in the entropy of the measured fields, which occurs as a result of the activation of the processes of faults of lithospheric plates immediately before an earthquake. It was possible to reveal the phenomenon of processes with a high degree of determinism that occur before a seismic event. A change in the nature of the movement of stations of space geodesy and geodynamics of the CrAO for all coordinates was registered a few days before the start of the block of Turkish earthquakes, which indicates a change in the balance of forces in the region.
Earth, magnetic field, earthquake, precursors, Türkiye
1. A. E. Volvach, L. P. Kogan, and K. Kh. Kanonidi, Method for determining the probability of occurrence of earthquakes based on the detection of phenomena with a high level of determinism : Patent. 2778972 RF, SPK G01V 1/008 (2022.08); G01V 3/38 (2022.08). No. 2021122118 : App. 07/26/2021 : publ. 08/29/2022. 2022. Bull. No. 25. (In Russ.).
2. A. E. Volvach et al., “Changes in the properties of the statistics of physical and biophysical fields as earthquake precursor,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 108, pp. 106200-106200, Dec. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.106200.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CELUZO
3. L. P. Kogan, I. T. Bubukin, and V. B. Shtenberg, “To the question of calculating the probability of strong earthquakes in real time,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 145, pp. 110807-110807, Apr. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110807.
4. A. E. Volvach et al., “A Possible Relationship between the Sets of Quasi-Linear Local Trends Statistically Detected in the Variations of the Magnetic Field Parameters before Earthquakes in Seismicly Active Zones of the Black Sea, Caucasus, and Western Asia,” Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 0680, doihttps://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-5-0680.
5. A. E. Volvach et al., “Statistical precursors of a strong earthquake on April 6, 2009 on the Apennine Peninsula,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 8. p. e10200, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10200.
6. A. Volvach et al., “About Statistical Precursor Earthquakes on October 12, 2021 with a Magnitude of 6.4 on the Island of Crete,” Romanian Journal of Physics, vol. 68, no. 1-2, 2023.
7. A. Volvach et al., “On a comparison of the properties of a statistical functional from measurements of the magnetic field in the mid of the Russian continental platform and in a seismicly active region,” Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 257-272, 2023. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016794022600454.; ; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DLPQCP
