1. Natochin Yu.V. Osnovy fiziologii pochki. L.: Nauka, 1982, 184 s. [Natochin Yu.V. Fundamentals of kidney physiology, L.: Nauka, 1982, 184 p. (In Russ.)] EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZNILZR

2. Kellenberger S., Schild L. Epithelial sodium channel/Degenerin family of ion channels: a variety of function for a shared structure. Physiol. Rev., 2002, vol. 82, pp. 735-767.

3. Rousseaux C.G., Greene S.F. Sigma receptors [σRs]: biology in normal and diseased states. J. Recept. Signal. Trans., 2016, vol. 36, pp. 327-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10799893.2015.1015737; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WVIRJR

4. Hellewell S.B., Bruce A., Feinstein G., Orringer J., Williams W., Bowen W.D. Rat liver and kidney contain high densities of sigma 1 and sigma 2 receptors: characterization by ligand binding and photoaffinity labeling. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 1994, vol. 268, pp. 9-18.

5. Cobos E.J., Entrena J.M., Nieto F.R., Cendán C.M, Del Pozo E. Pharmacology and therapeutic potential of sigma(1) receptor ligands. Curr. Neuropharmacol., 2008, vol. 6, pp. 344-366.

6. Penke B., Fulop L., Szucs M., Frecska E. The role of sigma-1 receptor, an intracellular chaperone in neurodegenerative diseases. Curr. Neuropharmacol., 2018, vol. 16, pp. 97-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X15666170529104323; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YFUPJJ

7. Su T.-P., Hayashi T., Maurice T., Buch S., Ruoho A.E. The sigma-1 receptor chaperone as an inter-organelle signaling modulator. Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 2010, vol. 31, pp. 557-566.

8. Carnally S.M., Johannessen M., Henderson R.M., Jackson M.B., Edwardson J.M. Demonstration of a direct interaction between σ-1 receptors and acid-sensing ion channels. Biophys. J., 2010, vol. 98, pp. 1182-1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4293; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NYMRQH

9. Schuster D.I., Arnold F.J., Murphy R.B. Purification, pharmacological characterization and photoaffinity labeling of sigma receptors from rat and bovine brain. Brain Res., 1995, vol. 670, pp. 14-28.

10. Itzhak Y., Ruhland M., Krahling H. Binding of umespirone to the sigma receptor: evidence for multiple affinity states. Neuropharmacol., 1990, vol. 29, pp. 181-184.

11. Mel'nickaya A.V., Kruteckaya Z.I., Butov S.N., Kruteckaya N.I., Antonov V.G. Vliyanie neyroleptikov na transport Na+ v kozhe lyagushki. Aktual'nye voprosy biologicheskoy fiziki i himii, 2017, t. 2, s. 272-275. [Melnitskaya A.V., Krutetskaya Z.I., Butov S.N., Krutetskaya N.I., Antonov V.G. The effect of neuroleptics on Na+ transport in frog skin. Russian Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 272-275. (In Russ.)] EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZSITDV

12. Levine S.D., Kachadorian W.A., Levin D.N., Schlondorff D. Effects of trifluoperazine on function and structure of toad urinary bladder. Role of calmodulin vasopressin-stimulation of water permeability. J. Clin. Invest., 1981, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 662-72.

13. Bjerregaard H.F., Nielsen R. Trifluoperazine stimulated sodium transport by increased prostaglandin E2 synthesis in isolated frog skin (Rana esculenta). Acta. Physiol. Scand., 1986, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 75-85.

14. Bjerregaard H.F., Nielsen R. Trifluoperazine stimulated sodium transport through the apical surface of isolated frog skin. Acta. Physiol. Scand., 1988, vol. 134, no. 1, pp: 43-52.

15. Feldkamp M.D., O'Donnell S.E., Yu L., Shea M.A. Allosteric effects of the antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine on the energetics of calcium binding by calmodulin. Proteins, 2010, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 2265-82.