UDC 577

PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS ACCORDING TO TRANSLATIONAL DIFFUSION Protein-protein interactions according to translational diffusion

Published in Russian Journal of Biological Physics and Chemisrty · Volume 5, Issue 1 · Pages 81–84 · Rubric: General biophysics
Received: 20.03.2020 Accepted: 20.03.2020 Published: 25.03.2020 Language of publication: RUS
The article provides information on translational diffusion of unstructured αS-casein and hard globular α-chymotrypsin as a tool for evaluating intermolecular interactions in aqueous protein solutions. The self- and mutual diffusion coefficients of proteins were obtained using Pulsed Field Gradient Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (PFG NMR) and Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) methods. The theoretical description of the experimental data was based on the friction formalism of nonequilibrium thermodynamics [1]. As a result, sets of virial coefficients containing information on various types and contributions of intermolecular interactions were obtained. Also, the second virial coefficients were calculated from the model of the protein - protein potential of mean force, that contains description of charge - charge, charge - dipole, dipole - dipole potentials, dispersion Hamaker and the mean force osmotic-attraction potentials [2]. The proposed complex approach to the study of protein interactions made it possible to estimate the contribution of various interactions and described the intermolecular interactions of proteins that are fundamentally different in shape and structure.
protein-protein interactions, second virial coefficient, translational diffusion, NMR PFG, DLS
Funding
Rabota vypolnena pri podderzhke Rossiyskogo Fonda Fundamental'nyh Issledovaniy, grant № 20-04-00157.
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Kuznetsova M., Zaslavsky B.Y., Breydo L., Turoverov K.K., Uversky V.N. Beyond the excluded volume effects: mechanistic complexity of the crowded milieu. Molecules, 2015, vol. 20, pp. 1377-1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20011377; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UENHVJ

2. Zimmerman S.B., Minton A.P. Macromolecular crowding: biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct, 1993, vol. 22, pp. 27-65.

3. Kuznetsova M., Turoverov K.K., Uversky V.N. What macromolecular crowding can do to a protein. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2014, vol. 15, pp. 23090-23140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151223090; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UFNFCT

4. Shaw L.K., Grimsley G.R., Yakovlev G.I., Makarov A.A., Pace C.N. The effect of net charge on the solubility, activity, and stability of ribonuclease Sa. Protein Science, 2001, vol. 10, pp. 1206-1215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.440101; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LGZBER

5. Pelegrine D.H.G., Gasparetto C.A. Whey proteins solubility as function of temperature and pH. Food Science and Technology, 2005, vol. 38, pp. 77-80.

6. P. Schmittschmitt, J.M. Scholtz, Protein Science, 2003, vol. 12, pp. 2374-2378.

7. Neal B.L., Asthagiri D., Velev O.D., Lenhoff A.M., Kaler E.W. Why is the osmotic second virial coefficient related to protein crystallization? Journal of Crystal Growth, 1999, vol. 196, pp. 377-387. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ACFURF

8. Wu Z., Bratko D., Prausnitz J.M. Interaction between like-charged colloidal spheres in electrolyte solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1998, vol. 95, pp. 15169-15172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.26.15169; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LUJYRX

9. Dennison M., Masters A.J. High-level virial theory of hard spheroids. Phys. Rev. E, 2011, vol. 84, p. 021709 (1-11).

10. Roosen-Runge F., Hennig M., Zhang F., Jacobs R.M., Sztucki M., Schober H., Seydel T., Schreiber F. High-level virial theory of hard spheroids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2011, vol. 108, pp. 11815-11820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107287108; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OKUSYD

11. Vink H. Mutual diffusion and self-diffusion in the frictional formalism of non-equilibrium thermodynamics. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1, 1985, vol. 81, pp. 1725-1730.

12. Tokuyama M., Oppenheim I. Dynamics of hard-sphere suspensions. Phys. Rev. E, 1994, vol. 50, pp. 16-19.

13. Kusova A.M., Sitnitsky A.E., Idiyatullin B.Z., Bakirova D.R., Zuev Yu.F. The effect of shape and concentration on translational diffusion of proteins measured by PFG NMR. Appl Magn Reson., 2018, vol. 49, pp. 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-017-0957-y; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XXDXLN

14. Coen J., Blanch H.W., Prausnitz J.M. Salting out of aqueous proteins: phase equilibria and intermolecular potentials. AIChE Journal, 1995, vol. 41, pp. 996-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690410430; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KQJBSP

15. Le Bon C., Nicolai T., Kuil M.E., Hollander J.G. Self-diffusion and cooperative diffusion of globular proteins in solution. J. Phys. Chem., 1999, vol. 103, pp. 10294-10299.

16. Haynes C.A., Tamura K., Korfer H.R., Blanch H.W., Prausnitz J.M. Thermodynamic properties of aqueous. alpha-chymotrypsin solution from membrane osmometry measurements. J. Phys. Chem., 1992, vol. 96, pp. 905-912.

17. Israelachvili N. Intermolecular and surface forces. Third edition. Elsevier/Academic Press, University of California Santa Barbara, 2011.

18. Vilker V.L., Colton C.K., Smith K.A. The osmotic pressure of concentrated protein solutions: effect of concentration and pH in saline solutions of bovine serum albumin. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 1981, vol. 79, pp. 548-566.

19. Farrell Jr.H. M., Malin E.L., Brown E.M., Mora-Gutierrez A. Review of the chemistry of αS2-casein and the generation of a homologous molecular model to explain its properties J. Dairy Sci., 2009, vol. 92, pp. 1338-1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1711; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVTYZL

20. Sotomayor-Pérez C., Karst J.C., Ladant D., Chenal A. Mean net charge of intrinsically disordered proteins: experimental determination of protein valence by electrophoretic mobility measurements Intrinsically Disordered Protein Analysis, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 331-349.