The superfamily of DNA transposons IS630/Tc1/mariner is one of the most widely represented, both terrestrial and aquatic organisms. In the genome of Mnemiopsis leidyi , we found new seven elements belonging to this group of transposable elements. Phylogenetic analysis and analysis of the transposase catalytic domains of the detected elements showed that they represent three families ( rosa , mariner, pogo ) of the eight included in the IS630/Tc1/mariner superfamily.
Mnemiopsis leidyi, transposable elements, DNA transposons, IS630/Tc1/mariner, transposase
1. Nefedova L.N., Kim A.I. Molekulyarnaya filogeniya i sistematika retrotranspozonov i retrovirusov. Mol. Biol., 2009, t. 43, s. 807-817. [Nefedova L.N., Kim A.I. Molecular phylogeny and systematics of drosophila retrotransposons and retroviruses. Moleculyarnaya biologia, 2009, vol. 43, pp. 807-817 (In Russ.)]
2. Biemont C. A brief history of the status of transposable elements: from junk DNA to major players in evolution. Genetics, 2010, vol. 186, pp. 1085-1093, doihttps://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.124180.
3. Zaharenko L.P., Kovalenko L.V., Perepelkina M.P., Zaharov I.K. Vliyanie γ-radiacii na indukciyu transpoziciy hobo-elementa u Drosophila melanogaster. Genetika, 2006, t. 42, № 6, s. 763-767. [Zakharenko L.P., Kovalenko L.V., Zakharov I.K., Perepelkina M.P. The effect of γ-radiation on induction of the hobo element transposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica, 2006, vol. 42, iss. 6, pp. 763-767 (In Russ.)]
4. Yurchenko N.N., Kovalenko L.V., Zaharov I.K. Mobil'nye geneticheskie elementy: nestabil'nost' genov i genomov. Vavilovskiy zhurn. genetiki i selekcii, 2011, t. 15, vyp. 2, s. 261-270. [Yurchenko N.N., Kovalenko L.V., Zakharov I.K. Transposable elements: instability of genes and genomes. Vavilovskii zhurnal genetiki i selektsii, 2011, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 261-270 (In Russ.)]
5. Piacentini L., Fanti L., Specchia V. et al. Transposons, environmental changes, and heritable induced phenotypic variability. Chromosoma, 2014, vol. 123, pp. 345-354.
6. Kapitonov V.V., Jurka J. A universal classification of eukaryotic transposable elements implemented in Repbase. Nat. Rev. Genet, 2008, vol. 9, iss. 5, pp. 411-412, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2165-c1.
7. Jacobson J.W., Medhora M.M., Hartl D.L. Molecular structure of a somatically unstable transposable element in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1986, vol. 83, pp. 8684-8688.
8. Feschotte C., Pritham E.J. DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet., 2007, vol. 41, pp. 331-368.
9. Puzakov M.V., Puzakova L.V., Zaharov I.K. Raznoobrazie i rasprostranenie mobil'nyh geneticheskih elementov v genomah morskih bespozvonochnyh. Vavilovskiy zhurn. genetiki i selekcii, 2017, t. 21, vyp. 2, s. 269-283, doihttps://doi.org/10.18699/VJ16.16-o. [Puzakov M.V., Puzakova L.V., Zakharov I.K. Diversity and distribution of mobile genetic elements in marine invertebrates genomes. Vavilovskii zhurnal genetiki i selektsii, 2017, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 269-283, doihttps://doi.org/10.18699/VJ16.16-o (In Russ.)]
10. Kohany O., Gentles A.J., Hankus L., Jurka J. Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor. BMC Bioinformatics, 2006, vol. 25, iss. 7, p. 474.
11. Jurka J. Repeats in genomic DNA: mining and meaning. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1998, vol. 8, pp. 333-337.
12. Capy P., Vitalis R., Langin T. et al. Relationships between transposable elements based upon the integrase-transposase domains: is there a common ancestor? J. Mol. Evol., 1996, vol. 42, pp. 359-368.
13. Smit A.F.A., Riggs A.D. Tiggers and other DNA transposon fossils in the human genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, vol. 93, pp. 1443-1448.
14. Shao H., Tu Z. Expanding the diversity of the IS630-Tc1-mariner superfamily: discovery of a unique DD37E transposon and reclassification of the DD37D and DD39D transposons. Genetics, 2001, vol. 159, iss. 3, pp. 1103-1115.
15. Zhang H.H., Shen Y.H., Xiong X.M. et al. Identification and evolutionary history of the DD41D transposons in insects. Genes Genom., 2016, vol. 38, pp. 109-117, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-015-0356-4.
16. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, vol. 32, pp. 1792-1797.
17. Saitou N., Nei M. The Neighbor-Joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1987, vol. 4, pp. 406-425.
18. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D. et al. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2013, vol. 30, pp. 2725-2729.
