Sevastopol, Sevastopol, Russian Federation
Sevastopol, Sevastopol, Russian Federation
UDK 616.62-003.7 Образование мочевых камней
The factors formation the efficiency and safety of urinary stone crushing using holmium and thulium fiber lasers were selected, substantiated and normalized. A multifactorial integral criterion of urolithiasis treatment efficiency by laser lithotripsy was formed and analyzed. Recommendations are given for the use of lasers for crushing urinary stones.
solid-state and fiber lasers, contact laser lithotripsy, multifactorial criterion of treatment effectiveness
1. A. G. Martov, V. M. Diamant, A. V. Borisik, A. S. Andronov, and D. A. Dzhalilov, “Comparative evaluation of efficacy of electropulse and laser lithotriptors in vitro,” Urologiia, no. 2, pp. 70-78, 2013. (In Russ.).
2. V. S. Chernega and A. N. Eremenko, “Features of use of Solid State Lasers in the treatment of urolithiasis”, Infocommunications and Radio Technologies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 287-295, 2020. (In Russ.).
3. V. S. Chernega and I. A. Arbuzov, “Influence of design features of thulium fiber laser on clinical characteristics of lithotripter”, Infocommunications and Radio Technologies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31-41, 2021. (In Russ.).
4. I. Uygun, M. H. Okur, B. Aydogdu, Y. Arayici, B. Isler, and S. Otcu, “Efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy for urinary stone treatment in children,” Urological Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 751-755, Jul. 2012, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0495-x.
5. M. I. Kogan, I. I. Belousov, and A. M. Yassine, “Efficiency of contact ureterolithotripsy in treatment of proximal ureteral large stones,” Urology Herald, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12-25, 2019. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2019-7-1-12-25.
6. I. A. Arbuzov, I. V. Feofilov, S. A. Rakhimov, and V. S. Chernega, “Integral criterion for estimation the effectiveness of lithotripsy-treated urolithiasis,” Urology Herald, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 5-12, 2022. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-4-05-12.
7. V. V. Podinovsky, Ideas and methods of the theory of the importance of criteria in multicriteria decision making problems. Moscow : Nauka, 2019.
8. D. Mitropoulos, W. Artibani, M. Graefen, M. Remzi, M. Rouprêt, and M. Truss, “Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures : An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations,” European Urology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 341-349, Feb. 2012, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033.
9. V. Andreeva et al., “Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 497-503, May 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02785-9.
10. S. V. Popov, I. N. Orlov, D. A. Sytnik, M. M. Suleimanov, A. V. Emelianenko, E. A. Grin, and I. Yu. Pestryakov, “Comparison of the clinical efficacy of holmium and thulium ureterolithotripsy,” Experimental and Clinical Urology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 30-34, 2020. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2020-13-4-30-34.
11. W. Kamal et al., “Stone Retropulsion with Ho: YAG and Tm: YAG Lasers: A Clinical Practice-Oriented Experimental Study,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1145-1149, Nov. 2016, doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0212.
12. T. C. Hutchens, D. A. Gonzalez, P. B. Irby, and N. M. Fried, “Fiber optic muzzle brake tip for reducing fiber burnback and stone retropulsion during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 018001, Jan. 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.22.1.018001.
13. V. S. Chernega and I. A. Arbuzov, “Optimization of the parameters of a thulium fiber laser during transurethral contact lithotripsy,” Microwave and Telecommunication Technology, no. 4, pp. 281-282, 2022. (In Russ.).
